No, sir.

Photo
fieryaffair:

coketalk:

This may be a campaign about HIV/AIDS awareness, but that’s no excuse. This is blatant misogyny, really sinister stuff that conveys a much more profound message about the female body.
Take another look at it. She’s got a killer smile, but still, you can’t see her eyes. The model is cropped so that she’s essentially headless. What makes her human is gone. What makes her a woman is on display. That’s a very deliberate creative choice.
She is an object to be fucked without a brain or an identity. Worse still, her vagina is a fully indexed destination on a Google map. The visual metaphor is so potent (and porn is so ubiquitous) that this image is more jarring than one in which she shows us her actual pussy.
It’s not about the fact that she’s had sex with Bill Johnson and 19 others. Who gives a fuck? What’s toxic is the idea that they checked into her vagina on Foursquare. It’s saying is that a her private parts aren’t private at all. They’re public. That’s the implicit message in this image, and it’s degrading as hell.
It’s not slut-shaming so much as it’s female-shaming, and it reinforces the age-old cultural narrative that women’s bodies aren’t their own.


Zoom

fieryaffair:

coketalk:

This may be a campaign about HIV/AIDS awareness, but that’s no excuse. This is blatant misogyny, really sinister stuff that conveys a much more profound message about the female body.

Take another look at it. She’s got a killer smile, but still, you can’t see her eyes. The model is cropped so that she’s essentially headless. What makes her human is gone. What makes her a woman is on display. That’s a very deliberate creative choice.

She is an object to be fucked without a brain or an identity. Worse still, her vagina is a fully indexed destination on a Google map. The visual metaphor is so potent (and porn is so ubiquitous) that this image is more jarring than one in which she shows us her actual pussy.

It’s not about the fact that she’s had sex with Bill Johnson and 19 others. Who gives a fuck? What’s toxic is the idea that they checked into her vagina on Foursquare. It’s saying is that a her private parts aren’t private at all. They’re public. That’s the implicit message in this image, and it’s degrading as hell.

It’s not slut-shaming so much as it’s female-shaming, and it reinforces the age-old cultural narrative that women’s bodies aren’t their own.

via gasandka11
Posted on Monday, February 27 2012. Tagged with: misogyny
6584
Notes
  1. throatfucker liked this
  2. aapocalypstick liked this
  3. ikankebabs liked this
  4. captchablogue reblogged this from mercuryandmoonlight
  5. mercuryandmoonlight reblogged this from talkingfruitbat and added:
    I bet they don’t have this ad with just a guy’s package sitting there mapped by google, like ‘do you know what’s been...
  6. enajcosta reblogged this from doodlyroses and added:
    The world makes me sick.
  7. ribbonsandbowsxo liked this
  8. skeptic-tank reblogged this from coketalk
  9. fauxhemian reblogged this from fauxhemian
  10. nawduhdummy reblogged this from spermcunt1964
  11. spermcunt1964 reblogged this from funkies
  12. dontrustlemyjimmies liked this
  13. sleeplessinseoul liked this
  14. bonnywithasea liked this
  15. audrey-day liked this
  16. octopyuss reblogged this from stoical-bunny
  17. perniciousandmeagre liked this
  18. ashley-elle liked this
  19. stoical-bunny reblogged this from comrade-ringo
  20. skyconnoisseur liked this
  21. genuinerevision liked this
  22. neveradullmomentwithjordangibson liked this
  23. songbirdsweresinging reblogged this from size-too-small
  24. coatseye reblogged this from irutashi
  25. chimericalvagary liked this
  26. ilenva reblogged this from size-too-small and added:
    But sometimes something like this is what it takes for people to finally pay attention.
  27. buttsexington liked this
  28. thequeenandkingsly reblogged this from centaurstestickle
  29. irutashi reblogged this from boxytadpole
  30. redsirocco liked this
  31. boxytadpole reblogged this from sweetguts
  32. suckmycoccyx reblogged this from ooh-mister-stark
  33. cheesemebaby reblogged this from size-too-small and added:
    I believe this is showing us we can’t infinity any face with HIV, and that everything seems fine at first. I believe...
  34. prettylittlepasha reblogged this from benditlikebeifong
  35. trisarahdactyl reblogged this from ooh-mister-stark
  36. forshitsandgiggs liked this
  37. size-too-small reblogged this from bonnywithasea
  38. straightuphernose reblogged this from size-too-small
  39. dragonherring liked this
  40. comrade-ringo reblogged this from tearybabylaura and added:
    I’m not offended so much as I’m disappointed
  41. jiranis reblogged this from sweetguts
  42. ooh-mister-stark reblogged this from centaurstestickle
  43. the-snow liked this
  44. chrc liked this
  45. chrc reblogged this from sweetguts
  46. letsbeahermit liked this
  47. electripants liked this
  48. sweetguts reblogged this from tearybabylaura
  49. centaurstestickle reblogged this from tearybabylaura
  50. Show more notesLoading...
No, sir. Sapiosexual genderqueer. Ze and hir pronouns, please.
Ask me anything
Previous Next